StockData

Cibus vs Evogene

CBUS and EVGN side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CBUS and EVGN compare

Cibus grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−10.3% versus −30.9% for Evogene).

Evogene keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −220% compared with −2259% at Cibus.

Cibus scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for Evogene), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCBUSEVGN
Size and price
Market cap$88.7M–
Share price$1.16$0.395
Change, 1 year−12.8%−66.6%
Change, 5 years−99.3%−98.1%
Beta (5Y)1.741.04
Employees11878
StockData Score
Total score4 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score11
Performance score11
Health score2 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S20.4×–
P/B6.0×–
FCF yield−52.2%–
Fair value$0.461–
Margin of safety−151%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−10.3% (better)−30.9%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−31.3%29.9% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin–−6.3%
Operating margin−1451%−364% (better)
Net margin−2259%−220% (better)
FCF margin−1066%−354% (better)
Return on equity−226%–
Return on invested capital−311%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.06–
Interest coverage–−7.3×
Current ratio1.623.57 (better)
Altman Z-score−4.46–
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions24.2%3.2%
Held by insiders35.2%50.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$695K
Short interest, % of float6.2%1.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.