StockData

Ceribell vs NeuroPace

CBLL and NPCE side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CBLL and NPCE compare

Ceribell is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as NeuroPace ($1.1B against $430M).

Ceribell grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.7% versus 16.9% for NeuroPace).

NeuroPace keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −19.3% compared with −64.7% at Ceribell.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCBLLNPCE
Size and price
Market cap$1.1B$430M
Share price$27.80$12.52
Change, 1 year136%−6.9%
Change, 5 years–5.7%
Beta (5Y)0.841.07
Employees327209
StockData Score
Total score66
Valuation score00
Growth score34 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score3 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S10.5×4.3× (better)
P/B8.3× (better)36.2×
FCF yield−5.1%−2.7% (better)
Fair value$11.11$6.55
Margin of safety−150%−91.2% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)31.7% (better)16.9%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–19.4%
Profitability
Gross margin88.9% (better)79.6%
Operating margin−68.6%−15.3% (better)
Net margin−64.7%−19.3% (better)
FCF margin−53.7%−11.7% (better)
Return on equity−43.9% (better)−122%
Return on invested capital−331%−67.8% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.16 (better)4.97
Interest coverage−38.6×−2.4× (better)
Current ratio9.18 (better)4.94
Altman Z-score14.89 (better)−3.77
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–0.00%
Years of dividend growth–0
Buyback yield–0.00%
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions79.5%77.4%
Held by insiders26.7%16.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$22.4M−$399K (better)
Short interest, % of float7.0%3.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.