CBAK Energy Technology vs Eos Energy Enterprises
CBAT and EOSE side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CBAT and EOSE compare
Eos Energy Enterprises is the larger company, worth 7.8 times as much as CBAK Energy Technology ($725M against $93.1M).
Eos Energy Enterprises grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (320% versus 50.5% for CBAK Energy Technology).
Eos Energy Enterprises keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 89.2% compared with −7.4% at CBAK Energy Technology.
CBAK Energy Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Eos Energy Enterprises), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CBAT | EOSE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $93.1M | $725M |
| Share price | $1.05 | $1.99 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.6% | −89.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −50.7% | −79.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.17 | 2.35 |
| Employees | 1,739 | 787 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 2.7× |
| P/B | 0.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 2.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 39.4% (better) | −61.1% |
| Fair value | $2.68 | – |
| Margin of safety | 60.8% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 50.5% | 320% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 39.0% | 250% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −4664% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 6.4% (better) | −72.0% |
| Operating margin | −11.0% (better) | −121% |
| Net margin | −7.4% | 89.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 16.0% (better) | −166% |
| Return on equity | −15.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −16.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.43 | – |
| Interest coverage | −22.4× | −7.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.65 | 3.31 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.28 (better) | −2.81 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 62.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 50.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$17.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.71% | – |
Go deeper
- CBAT stock overview
- CBAT income statement
- CBAT valuation and score
- EOSE stock overview
- EOSE income statement
- EOSE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.