CrossAmerica Partners LP vs AMCON Distributing
CAPL and DIT side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CAPL and DIT compare
CrossAmerica Partners LP is the larger company, worth 13 times as much as AMCON Distributing ($774M against $60.7M).
AMCON Distributing grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.9% versus 9.1% for CrossAmerica Partners LP).
Both pay dividends: CrossAmerica Partners LP yields 7.8% and AMCON Distributing 0.58%.
AMCON Distributing scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for CrossAmerica Partners LP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CAPL | DIT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $774M | $60.7M |
| Share price | $20.27 | $62.24 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.5% | −20.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 6.3% | −44.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.31 | 0.15 |
| Employees | 548 | 1,465 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 24.7× |
| P/S | 0.2× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | – | 0.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.3× | 3.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 8.6× | – |
| FCF yield | 11.6% (better) | −22.5% |
| Fair value | $29.29 | $218.47 |
| Margin of safety | 30.8% | 71.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.1% | 10.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.6% (better) | 13.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 315% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 306% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −32.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.3% (better) | 6.1% |
| Operating margin | 2.7% (better) | 0.44% |
| Net margin | – | 0.08% |
| FCF margin | 2.2% (better) | −0.44% |
| Return on equity | – | 2.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 6.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.09 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.98 | 0.44 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.4× (better) | 1.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.78 | 2.34 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.94 | 8.67 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.8% (better) | 0.58% |
| Payout ratio | – | 27.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −29.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.8% (better) | 0.58% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 23.6% | 10.8% |
| Held by insiders | 70.7% | 75.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.70% | 0.41% |
Go deeper
- CAPL stock overview
- CAPL income statement
- CAPL valuation and score
- DIT stock overview
- DIT income statement
- DIT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.