Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises vs SPX Technologies
BW and SPXC side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BW and SPXC compare
SPX Technologies is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises ($7.8B against $679M).
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (75.2% versus 20.2% for SPX Technologies).
SPX Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.5% compared with 4.1% at Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises.
SPX Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 6 for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BW | SPXC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $679M | $7.8B |
| Share price | $4.56 | $154.83 |
| Change, 1 year | −34.9% | −29.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −53.2% | 142% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.46 | 1.10 |
| Employees | 1,650 | 4,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 26.2× |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 3.0× |
| P/B | 6.2× | 3.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.0× (better) | 16.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 34.2× |
| FCF yield | −23.0% | 2.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $4.60 | $196.61 |
| Margin of safety | 0.91% | 21.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 75.2% (better) | 20.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.74% | 15.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 33.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 26.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 18.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 17.9% | 39.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.7% | 16.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.1% | 11.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −15.8% | 8.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 13.0% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.55 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.18 |
| Interest coverage | 1.8× | 11.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.79 | 1.84 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.55 | 3.09 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −52.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −52.6% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.1% | 94.6% |
| Held by insiders | 33.1% | 2.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.5M (better) | −$11.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 15.3% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- BW stock overview
- BW income statement
- BW valuation and score
- SPXC stock overview
- SPXC income statement
- SPXC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.