First Busey vs Enterprise Financial Services
BUSE and EFSC side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BUSE and EFSC compare
First Busey and Enterprise Financial Services are about the same size, with market caps of $2.4B and $2.2B.
On earnings, First Busey is cheaper: it trades at 11.8× trailing earnings, against 12.6× for Enterprise Financial Services.
First Busey grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (23.7% versus 5.0% for Enterprise Financial Services).
First Busey keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.2% compared with 25.0% at Enterprise Financial Services.
Both pay dividends: First Busey yields 3.6% and Enterprise Financial Services 2.1%.
First Busey scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 13 for Enterprise Financial Services), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BUSE | EFSC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.4B | $2.2B |
| Share price | $28.94 | $62.53 |
| Change, 1 year | 26.3% | 16.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 5.0% | 32.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 1,914 | 805 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.8× (better) | 12.6× |
| P/S | 3.0× | 3.0× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/FCF | 10.7× | 9.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 9.3% | 10.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $30.38 | $60.22 |
| Margin of safety | 4.7% (better) | −3.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 23.7% (better) | 5.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 17.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 124% (better) | −4.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 113% (better) | −2.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −4.3% | 14.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 29.2% (better) | 25.0% |
| FCF margin | 28.4% | 31.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.8% (better) | 9.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.04 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.16 | 0.21 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.6% (better) | 2.1% |
| Payout ratio | 46.4% | 26.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 11 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.6% | 11.1% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 9.2% (better) | 3.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 12.8% (better) | 6.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 67.6% | 85.4% |
| Held by insiders | 4.7% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$266K | −$75.7K (better) |
Go deeper
- BUSE stock overview
- BUSE income statement
- BUSE valuation and score
- EFSC stock overview
- EFSC income statement
- EFSC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.