Black Titan vs 3 E Network Technology
BTTC and MASK side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BTTC and MASK compare
3 E Network Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.5% versus −18.8% for Black Titan).
3 E Network Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.7% compared with −268% at Black Titan.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BTTC | MASK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.316 | $1.80 |
| Change, 1 year | −90.7% | −86.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −98.9% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 5.46 | −1.46 |
| Employees | 42 | 17 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −18.8% | 48.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −2883% | −126% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −1625% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.5% | 47.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | −262% | 3.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −268% | −2.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −232% | −43.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | −228% | −2.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −528% | 1.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | −24100.3× | 1.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 4.40 (better) | 4.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 2.1% | – |
| Held by insiders | 79.1% | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.4% | – |
Go deeper
- BTTC stock overview
- BTTC income statement
- BTTC valuation and score
- MASK stock overview
- MASK income statement
- MASK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.