StockData

Borealis Foods vs Laird Superfood

BRLS and LSF side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BRLS and LSF compare

Laird Superfood is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Borealis Foods ($28.0M against $22.1M).

Laird Superfood grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (73.3% versus 14.0% for Borealis Foods).

Laird Superfood keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3.4% compared with −56.5% at Borealis Foods.

Laird Superfood scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 2 for Borealis Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBRLSLSF
Size and price
Market cap$22.1M$28.0M
Share price$1.03$2.50
Change, 1 year−71.2%−40.2%
Change, 5 years−89.6%−83.7%
Beta (5Y)−0.021.29
Employees14026
StockData Score
Total score211 (better)
Valuation score02 (better)
Growth score22
Performance score02 (better)
Health score05 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.7×0.3× (better)
P/B–2.5×
Fair value–$3.13
Margin of safety–20.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)14.0%73.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–14.1%
Profitability
Gross margin10.6%32.4% (better)
Operating margin−31.4%−9.4% (better)
Net margin−56.5%−3.4% (better)
Return on equity–−22.9%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−1.6×–
Current ratio0.093.05 (better)
Altman Z-score−4.490.36 (better)
Piotroski F-score5 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions24.0%17.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$350K

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.