BellRing Brands vs Celsius
BRBR and CELH side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BRBR and CELH compare
Celsius is the larger company, worth 7.2 times as much as BellRing Brands ($8.4B against $1.2B).
On earnings, BellRing Brands is cheaper: it trades at 7.0× trailing earnings, against 37.1× for Celsius.
Celsius grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (49.1% versus 5.9% for BellRing Brands).
Celsius keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.0% compared with 7.3% at BellRing Brands.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BRBR | CELH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $8.4B |
| Share price | $10.01 | $33.04 |
| Change, 1 year | −64.6% | −25.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −56.7% | 36.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 1.50 |
| Employees | 530 | 1,497 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 16 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.0× (better) | 37.1× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 2.6× |
| P/B | – | 6.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.8× (better) | 18.5× |
| P/FCF | 5.2× (better) | 31.1× |
| PEG | 0.29 | – |
| FCF yield | 19.3% (better) | 3.2% |
| Fair value | $35.52 | $46.37 |
| Margin of safety | 71.8% (better) | 28.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.9% | 49.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.6% | 80.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −24.9% | 392% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −18.9% | 709% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 22.9% | 46.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.6% | 47.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 13.3% (better) | 13.0% |
| Net margin | 7.3% | 10.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.6% (better) | 8.5% |
| Return on equity | – | 25.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 36.4% (better) | 27.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.53 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.27 (better) | −0.06 |
| Interest coverage | – | 8.7× |
| Current ratio | 2.25 (better) | 1.97 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.68 (better) | 3.58 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 29.6% (better) | 0.15% |
| Shareholder yield | 29.6% (better) | 0.15% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 114% | 65.9% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 2.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$30.3K | $2.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.9% | 11.9% |
Go deeper
- BRBR stock overview
- BRBR income statement
- BRBR valuation and score
- CELH stock overview
- CELH income statement
- CELH valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.