Brookfield Property Partners L.P. vs Cushman & Wakefield
BPYPM and CWK side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BPYPM and CWK compare
Cushman & Wakefield grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.2% versus −21.6% for Brookfield Property Partners L.P.).
Cushman & Wakefield scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 0 for Brookfield Property Partners L.P.), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BPYPM | CWK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $3.1B |
| Share price | $15.38 | $13.30 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.7% | −16.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −38.4% | −26.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 1.48 |
| Employees | 24K | 53K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 44.3× |
| P/S | – | 0.3× |
| P/B | – | 1.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.7× |
| P/FCF | – | 15.6× |
| FCF yield | – | 6.4% |
| Fair value | – | $9.55 |
| Margin of safety | – | −39.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −21.6% | 10.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.6% | 5.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −68.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −68.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 18.1% |
| Operating margin | – | 4.5% |
| Net margin | – | 0.63% |
| FCF margin | −18.9% | 1.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 3.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 9.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.24 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 9.17 | 3.50 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.3× |
| Current ratio | – | 1.06 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.85 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −2.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 96.2% |
| Held by insiders | – | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$989K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 6.6% |
Go deeper
- BPYPM stock overview
- BPYPM income statement
- BPYPM valuation and score
- CWK stock overview
- CWK income statement
- CWK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.