Box vs Sprinklr
BOX and CXM side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BOX and CXM compare
Box is the larger company, worth 3.8 times as much as Sprinklr ($6.0B against $1.6B).
On earnings, Box is cheaper: it trades at 63.2× trailing earnings, against 68.0× for Sprinklr.
Box grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.6% versus 6.3% for Sprinklr).
Box keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.6% compared with 2.7% at Sprinklr.
Sprinklr scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for Box), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BOX | CXM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.0B | $1.6B |
| Share price | $43.63 | $6.80 |
| Change, 1 year | 36.5% | −9.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 77.3% | −59.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 1.38 |
| Employees | 2,912 | 3,258 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 63.2× (better) | 68.0× |
| P/S | 4.9× | 1.8× (better) |
| P/B | – | 3.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 40.9× | 20.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 15.4× | 12.4× (better) |
| PEG | 0.56 | – |
| FCF yield | 6.5% | 8.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $27.27 | $5.93 |
| Margin of safety | −60.0% | −14.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.6% (better) | 6.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.8% | 17.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −42.8% (better) | −80.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −44.4% (better) | −77.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 79.5% (better) | 65.6% |
| Operating margin | 9.4% (better) | 5.3% |
| Net margin | 10.6% (better) | 2.7% |
| FCF margin | 31.5% (better) | 14.6% |
| Return on equity | – | 4.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 6.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | 11.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.06 | 1.56 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.24 (better) | 2.67 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 6.0% | 8.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 6.0% | 8.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 102% | 56.4% |
| Held by insiders | 3.8% | 60.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.7M | −$10.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 12.2% |
Go deeper
- BOX stock overview
- BOX income statement
- BOX valuation and score
- CXM stock overview
- CXM income statement
- CXM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.