StockData

Bowhead Specialty vs NI

BOW and NODK side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BOW and NODK compare

Bowhead Specialty is the larger company, worth 3.7 times as much as NI ($1.1B against $306M).

On earnings, Bowhead Specialty is cheaper: it trades at 18.4× trailing earnings, against 20.5× for NI.

Bowhead Specialty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.0% versus −12.9% for NI).

Bowhead Specialty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.1% compared with 5.8% at NI.

Bowhead Specialty scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for NI), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBOWNODK
Size and price
Market cap$1.1B$306M
Share price$34.13$14.98
Change, 1 year27.5%12.5%
Change, 5 years–−23.6%
Beta (5Y)0.330.34
Employees296172
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)5
Valuation score12 (better)
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score22
Health score00
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E18.4× (better)20.5×
P/S1.8×1.2× (better)
P/B2.4×1.3× (better)
EV/EBITDA11.1×–
P/FCF3.4×–
PEG0.37–
FCF yield29.2% (better)−1.00%
Fair value$26.38$13.59
Margin of safety−29.4%−10.2% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)25.0% (better)−12.9%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−1.4%
Net income growth (TTM)25.7%480% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)26.7%508% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin–35.0%
Net margin10.1% (better)5.8%
FCF margin53.5% (better)−1.2%
Return on equity14.1% (better)6.2%
Financial health
Altman Z-score0.611.81 (better)
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions92.7%25.3%
Held by insiders76.6%2.3%
Short interest, % of float19.6%0.43%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.