Boston Omaha vs Gladstone Commercial
BOC and GOOD side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BOC and GOOD compare
Gladstone Commercial is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Boston Omaha ($490M against $414M).
Gladstone Commercial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.8% versus 3.7% for Boston Omaha).
Gladstone Commercial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.5% compared with −12.1% at Boston Omaha.
Gladstone Commercial pays a dividend yielding 11.9%; Boston Omaha does not pay one.
Gladstone Commercial scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Boston Omaha), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BOC | GOOD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $414M | $490M |
| Share price | $13.74 | $10.12 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.5% | −7.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −54.7% | −55.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.69 | 0.83 |
| Employees | 422 | 75 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 38.9× |
| P/S | 3.8× | 2.9× (better) |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 3.1× |
| FCF yield | −1.4% | – |
| Fair value | $16.25 | $11.55 |
| Margin of safety | 15.4% (better) | 12.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.7% | 10.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.1% (better) | 3.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −1830% | −13.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −1500% | −27.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 9.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 65.7% | – |
| Operating margin | −4.7% | – |
| Net margin | −12.1% | 14.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −5.2% | – |
| Return on equity | −2.6% | 14.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −0.78% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.09 | – |
| Interest coverage | −2.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.05 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.68 (better) | 0.46 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 11.9% |
| Payout ratio | – | 282% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −4.4% |
| Buyback yield | 3.9% (better) | −4.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.9% | 7.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 66.3% | 54.7% |
| Held by insiders | 46.2% | 0.26% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.2M (better) | $197K |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.7% | – |
Go deeper
- BOC stock overview
- BOC income statement
- BOC valuation and score
- GOOD stock overview
- GOOD income statement
- GOOD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.