StockData

Birkenstock vs Genesco

BIRK and GCO side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BIRK and GCO compare

Birkenstock grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.8% versus 3.0% for Genesco).

Birkenstock keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.8% compared with 1.7% at Genesco.

Genesco scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Birkenstock), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBIRKGCO
Size and price
Market cap–$384M
Share price$36.30$35.49
Change, 1 year−12.4%9.5%
Change, 5 years–−48.6%
Beta (5Y)1.091.56
Employees8,40016K
StockData Score
Total score811 (better)
Valuation score04 (better)
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score34 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.2×
P/B–0.7×
EV/EBITDA–3.4×
P/FCF–5.2×
FCF yield–19.2%
Fair value–$53.65
Margin of safety–33.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)11.8% (better)3.0%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–6.4%
Net income growth (TTM)9.4%–
EPS growth (TTM)11.6%–
Profitability
Gross margin56.9% (better)47.5%
Operating margin24.2% (better)2.0%
Net margin14.8% (better)1.7%
FCF margin12.9% (better)3.0%
Return on equity–7.8%
Return on invested capital–8.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.03
Net debt / EBITDA1.47 (better)−0.41
Interest coverage5.7×–
Current ratio3.78 (better)1.58
Altman Z-score–2.40
Piotroski F-score9 (better)7
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–0.00%
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions92.0%88.7%
Held by insiders64.1%30.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.1B$110K (better)
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float–16.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.