Smartbird vs Ooma
BIRD and OOMA side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BIRD and OOMA compare
Ooma is the larger company, worth 34 times as much as Smartbird ($505M against $14.9M).
Ooma grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.2% versus −19.3% for Smartbird).
Ooma keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.6% compared with −72.8% at Smartbird.
Smartbird pays a dividend yielding 24.6%; Ooma does not pay one.
Smartbird scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Ooma), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BIRD | OOMA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $14.9M | $505M |
| Share price | $1.26 | $18.30 |
| Change, 1 year | −79.0% | 55.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.7% | −8.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 3.03 | 0.77 |
| Employees | 200 | 1,420 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 48.2× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 1.6× |
| P/B | 0.7× (better) | 5.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 31.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 16.7× |
| FCF yield | −359% | 6.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $9.11 | $10.69 |
| Margin of safety | 86.2% (better) | −71.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −19.3% | 17.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −7.0% | 10.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.1% | 61.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −69.3% | 3.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −72.8% | 3.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | −50.5% | 9.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −164% | 11.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −496% | 14.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.01 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −1.03 |
| Current ratio | 3.70 (better) | 0.95 |
| Altman Z-score | −19.98 | 3.07 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 24.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 24.6% (better) | 1.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 12.3% | 72.3% |
| Held by insiders | – | 12.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$747K (better) | −$5.7M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 7.4% |
Go deeper
- BIRD stock overview
- BIRD income statement
- BIRD valuation and score
- OOMA stock overview
- OOMA income statement
- OOMA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.