Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. vs Royal Caribbean Cruises
BIP and RCL side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BIP and RCL compare
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.8% versus 9.7% for Royal Caribbean Cruises).
Royal Caribbean Cruises pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. does not pay one.
Royal Caribbean Cruises scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 4 for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P.), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BIP | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $86.5B |
| Share price | $39.15 | $323.27 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.5% | 22.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 2.1% | 302% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.71 | 1.58 |
| Employees | 64K | 108K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.1× |
| P/S | – | 4.5× |
| P/B | – | 7.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 15.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 57.3× |
| FCF yield | – | 1.7% |
| Fair value | – | $232.53 |
| Margin of safety | – | −39.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.8% (better) | 9.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.1% | 52.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 11.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2150% (better) | 13.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 31.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 26.9% | 49.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 25.1% | 27.6% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 23.8% |
| FCF margin | −0.23% | 7.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 41.7% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 16.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.91 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.01 |
| Interest coverage | 1.5× | 4.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.89 (better) | 0.22 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.42 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 9 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 29.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 35.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.8% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 3.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 88.8% |
| Held by insiders | 42.1% | 6.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $55.3K (better) | −$873M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- BIP stock overview
- BIP income statement
- BIP valuation and score
- RCL stock overview
- RCL income statement
- RCL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.