StockData

Bausch Health Companies vs Grifols

BHC and GRFS side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BHC and GRFS compare

Bausch Health Companies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.8% versus 4.3% for Grifols).

Grifols keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.3% compared with −7.6% at Bausch Health Companies.

Grifols scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Bausch Health Companies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBHCGRFS
Size and price
Market cap$3.1B–
Share price$8.35$8.69
Change, 1 year20.3%0.00%
Change, 5 years−67.9%−26.9%
Beta (5Y)1.000.89
Employees20K1,613
StockData Score
Total score89 (better)
Valuation score4 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score14 (better)
Health score13 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.3×–
EV/EBITDA9.3×–
P/FCF1.7×–
FCF yield59.7%–
Fair value$37.02–
Margin of safety77.4%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)10.8% (better)4.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average5.0%7.1% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−332%156% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−336%157% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average–−8.1%
Profitability
Gross margin–38.0%
Operating margin11.2%16.5% (better)
Net margin−7.6%5.3% (better)
FCF margin16.8% (better)10.4%
Return on equity–7.2%
Return on invested capital5.5%14.6% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.41
Net debt / EBITDA7.570.79 (better)
Interest coverage0.8×2.0× (better)
Current ratio1.562.51 (better)
Altman Z-score0.22–
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–31.8%
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions63.4%20.8%
Held by insiders31.5%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$507K–
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float2.9%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.