B&G Foods vs BellRing Brands
BGS and BRBR side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BGS and BRBR compare
BellRing Brands is the larger company, worth 3.9 times as much as B&G Foods ($1.2B against $298M).
BellRing Brands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.9% versus −2.7% for B&G Foods).
BellRing Brands keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.3% compared with −4.7% at B&G Foods.
B&G Foods pays a dividend yielding 15.5%; BellRing Brands does not pay one.
BellRing Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 10 for B&G Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BGS | BRBR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $298M | $1.2B |
| Share price | $3.67 | $10.01 |
| Change, 1 year | −19.9% | −64.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −88.1% | −56.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.48 | 0.63 |
| Employees | 2,497 | 530 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 7.0× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | 0.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.0× | 6.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 3.0× (better) | 5.2× |
| PEG | – | 0.29 |
| FCF yield | 33.3% (better) | 19.3% |
| Fair value | $14.01 | $35.52 |
| Margin of safety | 73.8% (better) | 71.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.7% | 5.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −1.5% | 18.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −24.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −18.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 22.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.8% | 28.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.7% | 13.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −4.7% | 7.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.6% | 9.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −20.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 2.2% | 36.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 5.75 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 15.68 | 3.27 (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.84 (better) | 2.25 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.15 | 4.68 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 15.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −16.7% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 29.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 15.5% | 29.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 57.3% | 114% |
| Held by insiders | 5.3% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$248K | −$30.3K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 18.4% | 12.9% |
Go deeper
- BGS stock overview
- BGS income statement
- BGS valuation and score
- BRBR stock overview
- BRBR income statement
- BRBR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.