BETA Technologies vs Park Aerospace
BETA and PKE side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BETA and PKE compare
BETA Technologies is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as Park Aerospace ($6.5B against $556M).
BETA Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (85.3% versus 27.7% for Park Aerospace).
Park Aerospace keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.4% compared with −1008% at BETA Technologies.
Park Aerospace pays a dividend yielding 2.0%; BETA Technologies does not pay one.
Park Aerospace scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 5 for BETA Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BETA | PKE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.5B | $556M |
| Share price | $27.72 | $25.23 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.6% | 29.1% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 79.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.24 | 0.73 |
| Employees | 1,008 | 125 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 35.0× |
| P/S | 121× | 6.9× (better) |
| P/B | 4.3× | 3.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 23.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 48.5× |
| PEG | – | 14.01 |
| FCF yield | −7.2% | 2.1% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $21.18 |
| Margin of safety | – | −19.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 85.3% (better) | 27.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 9.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 103% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 100% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 18.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 62.5% (better) | 32.7% |
| Operating margin | −1033% | 21.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −1008% | 18.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −876% | 14.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | −46.8% | 11.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −135% | 29.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.12 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −37.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 11.51 | 22.75 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 9.57 | 28.34 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 69.4% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 48.9% | 88.6% |
| Held by insiders | 21.1% | 4.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$19.7M | −$9.4M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.3% | 6.4% |
Go deeper
- BETA stock overview
- BETA income statement
- BETA valuation and score
- PKE stock overview
- PKE income statement
- PKE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.