Brookfield Renewable vs TransAlta
BEPC and TAC side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BEPC and TAC compare
Brookfield Renewable grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−10.0% versus −15.5% for TransAlta).
TransAlta keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −5.7% compared with −62.9% at Brookfield Renewable.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BEPC | TAC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $30.71 | $13.21 |
| Change, 1 year | −26.9% | −13.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −21.0% | 21.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 0.71 |
| Employees | 614 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −10.0% (better) | −15.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.8% (better) | 2.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −1093% | −160% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −208% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 59.0% |
| Operating margin | – | 5.8% |
| Net margin | −62.9% | −5.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −17.1% | 16.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −8.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 2.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 2.57 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.71 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.40 | 0.73 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.8% | 79.9% |
| Held by insiders | 30.9% | 9.1% |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.2% | – |
Go deeper
- BEPC stock overview
- BEPC income statement
- BEPC valuation and score
- TAC stock overview
- TAC income statement
- TAC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.