Beam Global vs Pioneer Power Solutions
BEEM and PPSI side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BEEM and PPSI compare
Pioneer Power Solutions is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Beam Global ($25.2M against $15.2M).
Beam Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−20.5% versus −26.5% for Pioneer Power Solutions).
Pioneer Power Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −39.1% compared with −64.6% at Beam Global.
Pioneer Power Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Beam Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BEEM | PPSI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $15.2M | $25.2M |
| Share price | $0.673 | $2.27 |
| Change, 1 year | −70.9% | −47.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −97.7% | −69.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.41 | 1.74 |
| Employees | 220 | 58 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.0× |
| FCF yield | −84.9% | −30.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $1.42 | $3.57 |
| Margin of safety | 52.7% (better) | 36.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −20.5% (better) | −26.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 35.4% (better) | 7.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −125% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −127% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.2% | 16.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | −64.9% | −30.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −64.6% | −39.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −48.8% | −36.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −72.7% | −28.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −63.3% | −35.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −861.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.46 | 4.11 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −5.30 | 2.40 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 9.7% | 13.3% |
| Held by insiders | 5.8% | 63.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $0 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.7% | 0.73% |
Go deeper
- BEEM stock overview
- BEEM income statement
- BEEM valuation and score
- PPSI stock overview
- PPSI income statement
- PPSI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.