StockData

Baird Medical Investment vs Vivos Therapeutics

BDMD and VVOS side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BDMD and VVOS compare

Vivos Therapeutics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (45.2% versus −39.2% for Baird Medical Investment).

Baird Medical Investment keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −121% compared with −122% at Vivos Therapeutics.

Vivos Therapeutics scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for Baird Medical Investment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBDMDVVOS
Size and price
Market cap–$2.0M
Share price$0.090$0.098
Change, 1 year−93.0%−96.1%
Change, 5 years–−99.9%
Beta (5Y)−0.051.45
Employees146268
StockData Score
Total score23 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score00
Health score2 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.1×
FCF yield–−964%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−39.2%45.2% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–5.9%
Net income growth (TTM)−319%–
EPS growth (TTM)−272%–
Profitability
Gross margin83.8% (better)61.9%
Operating margin−114%−108% (better)
Net margin−121% (better)−122%
FCF margin−6.2% (better)−91.0%
Return on equity−77.5% (better)−6629%
Return on invested capital−48.2% (better)−335%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.22–
Interest coverage−72.3×−6.4× (better)
Current ratio1.29 (better)0.21
Altman Z-score–−11.01
Piotroski F-score13 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−297%
Shareholder yield–−297%
Ownership
Held by institutions–2.6%
Held by insiders62.0%30.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$1.8M
Short interest, % of float–21.9%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.