Brinks vs Forward Air
BCO and FWRD side by side, both in transportation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BCO and FWRD compare
Brinks is the larger company, worth 8.3 times as much as Forward Air ($4.8B against $582M).
Brinks grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.3% versus 2.5% for Forward Air).
Brinks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.9% compared with −10.1% at Forward Air.
Brinks pays a dividend yielding 0.65%; Forward Air does not pay one.
Brinks scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 3 for Forward Air), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BCO | FWRD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.8B | $582M |
| Share price | $116.80 | $17.24 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.7% | −20.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 75.8% | −83.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 1.35 |
| Employees | 65K | 6,062 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.6× | – |
| P/S | 0.9× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 16.1× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.6× (better) | 137× |
| P/FCF | 13.1× (better) | 18.3× |
| PEG | 3.21 | – |
| FCF yield | 7.7% (better) | 5.5% |
| Fair value | $118.98 | – |
| Margin of safety | 1.8% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.3% (better) | 2.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.3% | 14.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −6.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −3.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 72.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 26.1% | – |
| Operating margin | 10.0% (better) | −5.5% |
| Net margin | 2.9% (better) | −10.1% |
| FCF margin | 6.7% (better) | 1.2% |
| Return on equity | 56.0% (better) | −1291% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.9% (better) | −7.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 13.88 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.97 (better) | 99.43 |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× (better) | −0.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.55 (better) | 1.41 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.71 (better) | 0.70 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.65% (better) | 0.00% |
| Payout ratio | 26.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.4% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 110% | 90.2% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 14.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$169K | $0 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.2% | 6.3% |
Go deeper
- BCO stock overview
- BCO income statement
- BCO valuation and score
- FWRD stock overview
- FWRD income statement
- FWRD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.