Binah Capital vs TeraWulf
BCG and WULF side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BCG and WULF compare
TeraWulf is the larger company, worth 298 times as much as Binah Capital ($6.3B against $21.2M).
TeraWulf grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.9% versus 8.3% for Binah Capital).
Binah Capital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.6% compared with −411% at TeraWulf.
Binah Capital scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 2 for TeraWulf), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BCG | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $21.2M | $6.3B |
| Share price | $1.24 | $12.62 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.2% | −0.16% |
| Change, 5 years | −87.7% | −70.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.23 | 2.31 |
| Employees | – | 141 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 5.9× | – |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 33.0× |
| P/B | – | 7.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 2.7× | – |
| FCF yield | 36.8% (better) | −49.4% |
| Fair value | $3.96 | $3.93 |
| Margin of safety | 68.7% (better) | −221% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.3% | 13.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 65.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 384% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 25.7% |
| Operating margin | – | −250% |
| Net margin | 2.6% (better) | −411% |
| FCF margin | 4.0% (better) | −1631% |
| Return on equity | – | −140% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | −2.0× |
| Current ratio | – | 0.97 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.60 (better) | 0.05 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | −19.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −19.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 2.0% | 79.6% |
| Held by insiders | 6.0% | 20.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $13.9K (better) | −$35.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 30.9% |
Go deeper
- BCG stock overview
- BCG income statement
- BCG valuation and score
- WULF stock overview
- WULF income statement
- WULF valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.