Binah Capital vs Beneficient
BCG and BENF side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BCG and BENF compare
Binah Capital is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Beneficient ($19.3M against $10.5M).
Binah Capital scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 4 for Beneficient), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BCG | BENF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $19.3M | $10.5M |
| Share price | $1.13 | $0.681 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.2% | −82.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −88.8% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.21 | 0.79 |
| Employees | – | 50 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.1× | – |
| P/S | 0.1× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 3.4× | – |
| FCF yield | 29.1% (better) | −369% |
| Fair value | $2.96 | – |
| Margin of safety | 61.8% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.3% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −271% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 2.2% | – |
| FCF margin | 2.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 2.53 (better) | −13.90 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −6.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −6.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 2.0% | 36.6% |
| Held by insiders | 6.0% | 100% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $13.9K | $35.0K (better) |
Go deeper
- BCG stock overview
- BCG income statement
- BCG valuation and score
- BENF stock overview
- BENF income statement
- BENF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.