StockData

BioCardia vs Creative Medical Technology

BCDA and CELZ side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BCDA and CELZ compare

BioCardia is the larger company, worth 3.4 times as much as Creative Medical Technology ($14.0M against $4.2M).

Creative Medical Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for BioCardia), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBCDACELZ
Size and price
Market cap$14.0M$4.2M
Share price$0.922$0.630
Change, 1 year−28.6%−80.8%
Change, 5 years−97.2%−98.2%
Beta (5Y)1.021.56
Employees21–
StockData Score
Total score57 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score00
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–1384×
P/B5.2×0.6× (better)
FCF yield−54.3%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)–−50.0%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−48.4%
Profitability
Gross margin–66.9%
Operating margin–−256435%
Net margin–−249160%
Return on equity−1803%−119% (better)
Return on invested capital–−3737%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio2.0923.66 (better)
Altman Z-score−51.20−8.55 (better)
Piotroski F-score34 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−86.7% (better)−190%
Shareholder yield−86.7% (better)−190%
Ownership
Held by institutions8.8%5.7%
Held by insiders11.7%15.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months$170K–
Short interest, % of float5.5%1.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.