Boise Cascade vs UFP Industries
BCC and UFPI side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BCC and UFPI compare
UFP Industries is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Boise Cascade ($4.4B against $2.4B).
On earnings, UFP Industries is cheaper: it trades at 19.3× trailing earnings, against 19.8× for Boise Cascade.
Boise Cascade grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.2% versus −0.71% for UFP Industries).
UFP Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.6% compared with 1.8% at Boise Cascade.
Both pay dividends: Boise Cascade yields 1.3% and UFP Industries 1.8%.
UFP Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 13 for Boise Cascade), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BCC | UFPI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.4B | $4.4B |
| Share price | $67.39 | $79.49 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.1% | −12.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −6.3% | −10.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 7,680 | 14K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.8× | 19.3× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.9× (better) | 13.2× |
| P/FCF | 17.7× (better) | 22.5× |
| FCF yield | 5.7% (better) | 4.4% |
| Fair value | $77.05 | $83.94 |
| Margin of safety | 12.5% (better) | 5.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.2% (better) | −0.71% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.2% | 4.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −37.7% | −28.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −32.6% | −23.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −4.5% | 4.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.7% (better) | 15.4% |
| Operating margin | 2.8% | 4.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.8% | 3.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.0% | 3.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 5.7% | 7.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.3% | 8.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.22 | 0.08 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.18 (better) | −1.65 |
| Interest coverage | 7.0× | 29.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.82 | 3.86 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.17 | 5.56 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | 1.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 28.4% | 34.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 7 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −15.5% | 22.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 7.9% (better) | 7.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 9.2% | 9.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.4% | 88.5% |
| Held by insiders | 1.6% | 2.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$666K (better) | −$1.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- BCC stock overview
- BCC income statement
- BCC valuation and score
- UFPI stock overview
- UFPI income statement
- UFPI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.