Battalion Oil vs SandRidge Energy
BATL and SD side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BATL and SD compare
SandRidge Energy is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as Battalion Oil ($482M against $41.4M).
SandRidge Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.9% versus −12.0% for Battalion Oil).
SandRidge Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 50.1% compared with −24.5% at Battalion Oil.
SandRidge Energy pays a dividend yielding 5.4%; Battalion Oil does not pay one.
SandRidge Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 5 for Battalion Oil), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BATL | SD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $41.4M | $482M |
| Share price | $0.723 | $12.99 |
| Change, 1 year | −35.4% | 1.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −94.1% | 10.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.27 | 0.62 |
| Employees | 40 | 102 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 22 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 5.0× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 2.5× |
| P/B | 0.2× (better) | 0.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 3.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 10.2× |
| FCF yield | – | 9.8% |
| Fair value | $5.47 | $19.50 |
| Margin of safety | 86.8% (better) | 33.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −12.0% | 24.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.3% | 6.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −490% | 47.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 47.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −3.2% | 38.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −24.5% | 50.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 24.2% |
| Return on equity | −40.3% | 18.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −1.9% | 16.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.78 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −0.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.19 (better) | 1.52 |
| Altman Z-score | −0.41 | 1.93 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 5.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 23.3% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.01% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 11.6% | 81.7% |
| Held by insiders | 74.1% | 14.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$31.2M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 34.4% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- BATL stock overview
- BATL income statement
- BATL valuation and score
- SD stock overview
- SD income statement
- SD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.