Brookfield Asset Management vs Price T Rowe
BAM and TROW side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BAM and TROW compare
Brookfield Asset Management grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (47.9% versus 6.9% for Price T Rowe).
Brookfield Asset Management keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 81.0% compared with 28.4% at Price T Rowe.
Price T Rowe pays a dividend yielding 4.7%; Brookfield Asset Management does not pay one.
Price T Rowe scores higher on the StockData Score (23 against 7 for Brookfield Asset Management), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BAM | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $23.2B |
| Share price | $51.53 | $108.93 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.8% | 4.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −13.5% | −48.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 1.36 |
| Employees | 150 | 7,773 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 23 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 11.0× |
| P/S | – | 3.0× |
| P/B | – | 2.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 14.5× |
| PEG | – | 0.97 |
| FCF yield | – | 6.9% |
| Fair value | – | $153.98 |
| Margin of safety | – | 29.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 47.9% (better) | 6.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 3.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 118% (better) | 5.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 7.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −1.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 32.0% |
| Net margin | 81.0% (better) | 28.4% |
| FCF margin | – | 20.7% |
| Return on equity | 63.5% (better) | 19.7% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 25.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 4.92 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 4.7% |
| Payout ratio | 58.0% | 52.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 9 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 7.1% |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.8% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 7.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.3% | 89.3% |
| Held by insiders | 76.6% | 0.81% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$1.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | 12.9% |
Go deeper
- BAM stock overview
- BAM income statement
- BAM valuation and score
- TROW stock overview
- TROW income statement
- TROW valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.