StockData

Barrick Mining vs Sibanye Stillwater

B and SBSW side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How B and SBSW compare

Barrick Mining grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.2% versus 15.6% for Sibanye Stillwater).

Barrick Mining keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.4% compared with −4.0% at Sibanye Stillwater.

Barrick Mining scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 3 for Sibanye Stillwater), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBSBSW
Size and price
Share price$37.59$8.77
Change, 1 year0.70%−25.2%
Change, 5 years85.6%−34.1%
Beta (5Y)0.721.08
Employees–36K
StockData Score
Total score13 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score5 (better)1
Performance score4 (better)0
Health score4 (better)2
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)31.2% (better)15.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average6.1% (better)0.36%
Net income growth (TTM)133%–
EPS growth (TTM)140%–
EPS growth, 5Y average17.5%–
Profitability
Gross margin51.3% (better)24.6%
Net margin29.4% (better)−4.0%
FCF margin22.8% (better)0.85%
Return on equity19.2% (better)−12.4%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.17 (better)1.09
Net debt / EBITDA–1.87
Current ratio3.01 (better)1.78
Piotroski F-score8 (better)7
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio17.8%–
Years of dividend growth–1
Dividend growth, 5Y average–−67.7%
Ownership
Held by institutions60.5%4.6%
Held by insiders0.00%0.15%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$2.6M
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float1.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.