StockData

A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions vs Serve Robotics

AZ and SERV side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AZ and SERV compare

Serve Robotics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (411% versus 153% for A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions).

A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −236% compared with −2079% at Serve Robotics.

Serve Robotics scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAZSERV
Size and price
Market cap–$274M
Share price$6.25$3.17
Change, 1 year12.6%−70.3%
Change, 5 years−68.4%–
Beta (5Y)1.101.13
Employees12210
StockData Score
Total score410 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score11
Health score25 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–27.6×
P/B–0.9×
FCF yield–−64.6%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)153%411% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average49.2%–
Profitability
Gross margin20.1% (better)−322%
Operating margin−268% (better)−2207%
Net margin−236% (better)−2079%
FCF margin−248% (better)−1785%
Return on equity−69.8% (better)−70.2%
Return on invested capital−108% (better)−192%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.03 (better)0.00
Interest coverage–−219337.0×
Current ratio7.5210.85 (better)
Altman Z-score–3.19
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−34.6%
Shareholder yield–−34.6%
Ownership
Held by institutions44.4%37.5%
Held by insiders2.5%10.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$3.1M
Short interest, % of float12.1%41.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.