StockData

AXT vs FTC Solar

AXTI and FTCI side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AXTI and FTCI compare

AXT is the larger company, worth 159 times as much as FTC Solar ($2.7B against $17.3M).

AXT grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (89.1% versus 36.3% for FTC Solar).

AXT keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.5% compared with −22.2% at FTC Solar.

AXT scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 5 for FTC Solar), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAXTIFTCI
Size and price
Market cap$2.7B$17.3M
Share price$41.84$1.05
Change, 1 year281%−90.5%
Change, 5 years375%−98.9%
Beta (5Y)2.242.17
Employees1,072232
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)5
Valuation score11
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score4 (better)1
Health score4 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E93.0×–
P/S16.0×0.2× (better)
P/B3.0×–
EV/EBITDA46.9×–
P/FCF34.5×–
FCF yield2.9% (better)−45.7%
Fair value$17.70–
Margin of safety−136%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)89.1% (better)36.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−1.5% (better)−11.9%
Profitability
Gross margin44.0% (better)3.1%
Operating margin19.6% (better)−36.7%
Net margin18.5% (better)−22.2%
FCF margin46.5% (better)−7.2%
Return on equity5.8%–
Return on invested capital14.3%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.10–
Net debt / EBITDA−17.14–
Interest coverage–−2.3×
Current ratio3.80 (better)0.86
Altman Z-score7.73 (better)−5.17
Piotroski F-score34 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−46.5%
Shareholder yield0.00% (better)−46.5%
Ownership
Held by institutions71.6%8.6%
Held by insiders7.6%28.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$74.6M$273K (better)
Short interest, % of float22.1%13.8%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.