StockData

AudioCodes vs Clearfield

AUDC and CLFD side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AUDC and CLFD compare

Clearfield grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (34.0% versus 1.4% for AudioCodes).

AudioCodes keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.6% compared with −4.7% at Clearfield.

Clearfield scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for AudioCodes), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAUDCCLFD
Size and price
Market cap–$416M
Share price$8.66$30.59
Change, 1 year−9.2%−7.0%
Change, 5 years−75.7%−54.3%
Beta (5Y)1.181.53
Employees70243
StockData Score
Total score79 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score56 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–2.7×
P/B–1.7×
EV/EBITDA–54.8×
P/FCF–56.6×
FCF yield–1.8%
Fair value–$19.22
Margin of safety–−59.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)1.4%34.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average2.2%10.0% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−41.5% (better)−3710%
EPS growth (TTM)−38.0% (better)−5300%
EPS growth, 5Y average−17.9%–
Profitability
Gross margin65.0% (better)33.0%
Operating margin5.7% (better)−0.24%
Net margin3.6% (better)−4.7%
FCF margin9.3% (better)4.8%
Return on equity4.9% (better)−2.8%
Return on invested capital7.1% (better)−0.18%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio2.2212.53 (better)
Altman Z-score–13.62
Piotroski F-score77
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio122%–
Buyback yield–3.2%
Shareholder yield–3.2%
Ownership
Held by institutions35.7%64.4%
Held by insiders31.9%18.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$501K (better)−$854K
Short interest, % of float1.7%11.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.