Atlantic Union Bankshares vs M&T Bank
AUB and MTB side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AUB and MTB compare
M&T Bank is the larger company, worth 5.6 times as much as Atlantic Union Bankshares ($31.8B against $5.7B).
On earnings, M&T Bank is cheaper: it trades at 11.5× trailing earnings, against 11.9× for Atlantic Union Bankshares.
Atlantic Union Bankshares grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (46.5% versus 5.5% for M&T Bank).
M&T Bank keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 176% compared with 31.6% at Atlantic Union Bankshares.
Both pay dividends: Atlantic Union Bankshares yields 3.7% and M&T Bank 2.7%.
M&T Bank scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 16 for Atlantic Union Bankshares), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AUB | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.7B | $31.8B |
| Share price | $39.70 | $220.19 |
| Change, 1 year | 21.6% | 17.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 13.9% | 39.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.79 | 0.82 |
| Employees | 3,064 | 22K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 | 4 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.9× | 11.5× (better) |
| P/S | 3.7× (better) | 18.5× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.1× |
| PEG | – | 0.83 |
| Fair value | $41.99 | $231.39 |
| Margin of safety | 5.5% (better) | 4.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 46.5% (better) | 5.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.9% (better) | −22.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 139% (better) | 8.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 65.0% (better) | 18.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.0% | 11.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 31.6% | 176% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.8% | 10.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.21 (better) | 0.23 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.19 | 0.25 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.7% (better) | 2.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 29.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.8% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 7.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.7% | 10.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.7% | 91.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.97% | 0.36% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$465K (better) | −$24.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.8% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- AUB stock overview
- AUB income statement
- AUB valuation and score
- MTB stock overview
- MTB income statement
- MTB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.