StockData

ATS vs Ouster

ATS and OUST side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ATS and OUST compare

Ouster grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (62.8% versus 17.4% for ATS).

ATS keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.4% compared with −26.0% at Ouster.

Ouster scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for ATS), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricATSOUST
Size and price
Market cap–$2.6B
Share price$17.18$36.60
Change, 1 year−37.5%47.5%
Change, 5 years−55.8%−44.6%
Beta (5Y)0.962.41
Employees–204
StockData Score
Total score410 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score26 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–12.9×
P/B–7.1×
FCF yield–−3.1%
Fair value–$12.87
Margin of safety–−184%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)17.4%62.8% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–55.0%
Profitability
Gross margin28.6%49.6% (better)
Operating margin6.7% (better)−30.6%
Net margin2.4% (better)−26.0%
FCF margin14.0% (better)−40.2%
Return on equity4.1% (better)−18.0%
Return on invested capital4.9% (better)−98.2%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.72 (better)0.00
Net debt / EBITDA5.01–
Interest coverage2.0×–
Current ratio1.644.16 (better)
Altman Z-score–12.98
Piotroski F-score7 (better)6
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions83.2%49.6%
Held by insiders0.00%4.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$47.3M
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float–10.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.