ATS vs Enerflex
ATS and EFXT side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATS and EFXT compare
ATS grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.4% versus 6.5% for Enerflex).
ATS scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for Enerflex), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATS | EFXT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $17.65 | $20.21 |
| Change, 1 year | −35.6% | 49.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −54.5% | 212% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 0.82 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.4% (better) | 6.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 100% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.6% (better) | 22.6% |
| Operating margin | 6.7% | 11.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.4% | – |
| FCF margin | 14.0% (better) | 12.7% |
| Return on equity | 4.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 4.9% | 9.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.72 | 0.53 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.01 | 1.07 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.0× | 2.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.64 (better) | 1.13 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 83.2% | 67.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.1% |
Go deeper
- ATS stock overview
- ATS income statement
- ATS valuation and score
- EFXT stock overview
- EFXT income statement
- EFXT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.