StockData

Atara Biotherapeutics vs Humacyte

ATRA and HUMA side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ATRA and HUMA compare

Humacyte is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Atara Biotherapeutics ($164M against $82.6M).

Humacyte grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (52.5% versus −97.4% for Atara Biotherapeutics).

Atara Biotherapeutics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −369% compared with −3955% at Humacyte.

Atara Biotherapeutics scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for Humacyte), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricATRAHUMA
Size and price
Market cap$82.6M$164M
Share price$8.23$0.592
Change, 1 year−33.1%−56.2%
Change, 5 years−98.2%−94.6%
Beta (5Y)1.652.06
Employees14184
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)2
Valuation score00
Growth score11
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S20.8× (better)68.6×
P/B–9.1×
FCF yield–−53.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−97.4%52.5% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−162%–
Profitability
Gross margin–−475%
Operating margin−344% (better)−4603%
Net margin−369% (better)−3955%
FCF margin–−3697%
Return on equity–−1424%
Financial health
Interest coverage–−11.0×
Current ratio1.723.34 (better)
Altman Z-score−153.99−10.29 (better)
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−10.4%–
Shareholder yield−10.4%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions44.5%26.4%
Held by insiders55.5%8.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months$2.0M (better)$7.4K
Short interest, % of float6.6%11.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.