StockData

Atara Biotherapeutics vs CG Oncology

ATRA and CGON side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ATRA and CGON compare

CG Oncology is the larger company, worth 78 times as much as Atara Biotherapeutics ($6.4B against $82.6M).

CG Oncology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (184% versus −97.4% for Atara Biotherapeutics).

Atara Biotherapeutics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −369% compared with −3851% at CG Oncology.

Atara Biotherapeutics scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for CG Oncology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricATRACGON
Size and price
Market cap$82.6M$6.4B
Share price$8.23$72.61
Change, 1 year−33.1%80.5%
Change, 5 years−98.2%–
Beta (5Y)1.651.41
Employees14142
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)5
Valuation score00
Growth score11
Performance score11
Health score5 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S20.8× (better)1044×
P/B–6.5×
FCF yield–−2.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−97.4%184% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−162%–
Profitability
Operating margin−344% (better)−4294%
Net margin−369% (better)−3851%
FCF margin–−3068%
Return on equity–−28.3%
Return on invested capital–−2103%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Current ratio1.7221.70 (better)
Altman Z-score−153.9968.83 (better)
Piotroski F-score5 (better)1
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−10.4%−7.6% (better)
Shareholder yield−10.4%−7.6% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions44.5%106%
Held by insiders55.5%17.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months$2.0M$20.0M (better)
Short interest, % of float6.6%12.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.