Atomera vs Sealsq
ATOM and LAES side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATOM and LAES compare
Atomera grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (476% versus −99.8% for Sealsq).
Atomera keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −10429% compared with −136776% at Sealsq.
Atomera scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for Sealsq), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATOM | LAES |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $117M | – |
| Share price | $2.99 | $1.42 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.1% | −76.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −89.4% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.88 | 1.83 |
| Employees | 21 | 185 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 534× | – |
| P/B | 3.6× | – |
| FCF yield | −12.8% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 476% (better) | −99.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.95% (better) | −71.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −29.2% | 34520% (better) |
| Operating margin | −10969% (better) | −159196% |
| Net margin | −10429% (better) | −136776% |
| FCF margin | −6827% (better) | −128000% |
| Return on equity | −88.1% | −10.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | −97.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −1144.0× | −593.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 7.35 | 14.43 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.85 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −26.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −26.7% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 53.5% | 6.4% |
| Held by insiders | 5.4% | 0.80% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.9M | −$1.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.1% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- ATOM stock overview
- ATOM income statement
- ATOM valuation and score
- LAES stock overview
- LAES income statement
- LAES valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.