AST SpaceMobile vs BuzzFeed
ASTS and BZFD side by side, both in communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ASTS and BZFD compare
AST SpaceMobile is the larger company, worth 362 times as much as BuzzFeed ($14.3B against $39.4M).
AST SpaceMobile grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (671% versus −18.7% for BuzzFeed).
BuzzFeed keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −48.0% compared with −440% at AST SpaceMobile.
AST SpaceMobile scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for BuzzFeed), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ASTS | BZFD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $14.3B | $39.4M |
| Share price | $36.62 | $0.472 |
| Change, 1 year | −46.7% | −55.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 213% | −98.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.80 | 2.25 |
| Employees | 1,126 | 507 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 99.7× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.0× |
| FCF yield | −12.6% (better) | −70.5% |
| Fair value | – | $1.71 |
| Margin of safety | – | 72.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 671% (better) | −18.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 64.1% (better) | −10.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −68834% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −15700% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 37.5% |
| Operating margin | – | −43.8% |
| Net margin | −440% | −48.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | −1259% | −18.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −124% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −58.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.83 |
| Interest coverage | – | −12.0× |
| Current ratio | 13.65 (better) | 0.80 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.10 (better) | −7.71 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −5.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −5.6% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 44.3% | 9.1% |
| Held by insiders | 51.1% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$450M | $127K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 35.5% | – |
Go deeper
- ASTS stock overview
- ASTS income statement
- ASTS valuation and score
- BZFD stock overview
- BZFD income statement
- BZFD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.