Astec Industries vs Manitowoc
ASTE and MTW side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ASTE and MTW compare
Astec Industries and Manitowoc are about the same size, with market caps of $889M and $859M.
On earnings, Manitowoc is cheaper: it trades at 33.5× trailing earnings, against 77.3× for Astec Industries.
Astec Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.8% versus 10.2% for Manitowoc).
Manitowoc keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.1% compared with 0.74% at Astec Industries.
Astec Industries pays a dividend yielding 1.0%; Manitowoc does not pay one.
Astec Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for Manitowoc), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ASTE | MTW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $889M | $859M |
| Share price | $38.63 | $23.81 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.1% | 109% |
| Change, 5 years | −44.3% | 18.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.15 | 1.41 |
| Employees | 4,468 | 4,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 77.3× | 33.5× (better) |
| P/S | 0.6× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 1.3× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.6× | 8.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 16.1× (better) | 17.4× |
| FCF yield | 6.2% (better) | 5.7% |
| Fair value | $33.44 | $23.19 |
| Margin of safety | −15.5% | −2.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.8% (better) | 10.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.6% | 9.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −75.8% | −54.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −76.0% | −53.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −3.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.5% (better) | 19.1% |
| Operating margin | 3.1% | 3.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.74% | 1.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.6% (better) | 2.1% |
| Return on equity | 1.7% | 3.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.5% | 4.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.55 (better) | 0.67 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.98 | 2.83 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.31 (better) | 2.11 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.89 (better) | 2.36 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% | – |
| Payout ratio | 103% | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 3.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.0% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.1% | 83.9% |
| Held by insiders | 6.2% | 5.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$59.5K (better) | −$106K |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- ASTE stock overview
- ASTE income statement
- ASTE valuation and score
- MTW stock overview
- MTW income statement
- MTW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.