Astec Industries vs Gencor Industries
ASTE and GENC side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ASTE and GENC compare
Astec Industries is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as Gencor Industries ($889M against $257M).
Astec Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.8% versus −6.4% for Gencor Industries).
Gencor Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.5% compared with 0.74% at Astec Industries.
Astec Industries pays a dividend yielding 1.0%; Gencor Industries does not pay one.
Gencor Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for Astec Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ASTE | GENC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $889M | $257M |
| Share price | $38.63 | $17.54 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.1% | 29.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −44.3% | 40.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.15 | 0.57 |
| Employees | 4,468 | 318 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 77.3× | – |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 2.3× |
| P/B | 1.3× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.6× | 6.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 16.1× | – |
| FCF yield | 6.2% (better) | −0.63% |
| Fair value | $33.44 | $21.33 |
| Margin of safety | −15.5% | 17.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.8% (better) | −6.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.6% | 8.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −75.8% | −2.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −76.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −3.5% | 23.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.5% | 28.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.1% | 11.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.74% | 13.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.6% (better) | −1.5% |
| Return on equity | 1.7% | 6.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.5% | 15.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.55 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.98 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.31 | 19.16 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.89 | 13.79 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% | – |
| Payout ratio | 103% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 3.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.0% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.1% | 48.8% |
| Held by insiders | 6.2% | 27.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$59.5K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | 0.55% |
Go deeper
- ASTE stock overview
- ASTE income statement
- ASTE valuation and score
- GENC stock overview
- GENC income statement
- GENC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.