Arbe Robotics vs CID Holdco
ARBE and DAIC side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ARBE and DAIC compare
CID Holdco keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −277% compared with −2117% at Arbe Robotics.
Arbe Robotics scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 1 for CID Holdco), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ARBE | DAIC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $2.5M |
| Share price | $0.507 | $1.05 |
| Change, 1 year | −69.5% | −98.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −95.6% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.42 | 1.70 |
| Employees | 145 | 68 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 0.5× |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 250% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −1.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −24.1% | 42.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | −2360% | −253% (better) |
| Net margin | −2117% | −277% (better) |
| Return on equity | −80.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −140% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −11.4× |
| Current ratio | 2.30 (better) | 0.27 |
| Altman Z-score | – | −19.64 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 8.5% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$498K | −$130K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.0% | – |
Go deeper
- ARBE stock overview
- ARBE income statement
- ARBE valuation and score
- DAIC stock overview
- DAIC income statement
- DAIC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.