Arb Iot vs WeRide
ARBB and WRD side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ARBB and WRD compare
WeRide grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (89.6% versus 19.3% for Arb Iot).
Arb Iot keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −35.6% compared with −242% at WeRide.
Arb Iot scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for WeRide), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ARBB | WRD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $3.57 | $4.45 |
| Change, 1 year | −37.9% | −45.5% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −79.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | 0.09 |
| Employees | 5 | 3,801 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 19.3% | 89.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 36.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −4.0% | 30.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | −270% |
| Net margin | −35.6% (better) | −242% |
| FCF margin | – | −229% |
| Return on equity | −57.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −202.3× |
| Current ratio | 7.93 (better) | 5.36 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.00% | 3.9% |
| Held by insiders | 35.5% | 10.1% |
Go deeper
- ARBB stock overview
- ARBB income statement
- ARBB valuation and score
- WRD stock overview
- WRD income statement
- WRD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.