Alpha Pro Tech vs Lakeland Industries
APT and LAKE side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How APT and LAKE compare
Lakeland Industries is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Alpha Pro Tech ($92.3M against $63.8M).
Alpha Pro Tech grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.8% versus −0.35% for Lakeland Industries).
Alpha Pro Tech keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.1% compared with −14.0% at Lakeland Industries.
Lakeland Industries pays a dividend yielding 0.32%; Alpha Pro Tech does not pay one.
Alpha Pro Tech scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 8 for Lakeland Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | APT | LAKE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $63.8M | $92.3M |
| Share price | $6.25 | $9.29 |
| Change, 1 year | 31.0% | −43.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 19.0% | −53.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.56 | 0.92 |
| Employees | 122 | 2,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.3× | – |
| P/S | 1.0× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.0× | 0.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 7.1× | – |
| PEG | 1.48 | – |
| FCF yield | 14.2% (better) | −0.72% |
| Fair value | $10.04 | $32.22 |
| Margin of safety | 37.7% | 71.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.8% (better) | −0.35% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −10.5% | 3.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 40.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 50.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −29.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.6% (better) | 32.6% |
| Operating margin | 8.7% (better) | −4.1% |
| Net margin | 8.1% (better) | −14.0% |
| FCF margin | 14.2% (better) | −0.35% |
| Return on equity | 8.0% (better) | −19.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.2% (better) | −5.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.01 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −3.5× |
| Current ratio | 8.71 (better) | 2.98 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.52 (better) | 2.14 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.32% |
| Buyback yield | 1.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.9% (better) | 0.32% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 29.9% | 65.5% |
| Held by insiders | 17.3% | 24.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$570K | $1.3K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.89% | 14.9% |
Go deeper
- APT stock overview
- APT income statement
- APT valuation and score
- LAKE stock overview
- LAKE income statement
- LAKE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.