Abercrombie & Fitch vs Buckle
ANF and BKE side by side, both in family clothing stores. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ANF and BKE compare
Abercrombie & Fitch is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as Buckle ($6.3B against $2.2B).
On earnings, Buckle is cheaper: it trades at 10.0× trailing earnings, against 12.7× for Abercrombie & Fitch.
Buckle grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.2% versus 4.7% for Abercrombie & Fitch).
Buckle keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.6% compared with 10.0% at Abercrombie & Fitch.
Buckle pays a dividend yielding 10.1%; Abercrombie & Fitch does not pay one.
Buckle scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 14 for Abercrombie & Fitch), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ANF | BKE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.3B | $2.2B |
| Share price | $148.88 | $43.60 |
| Change, 1 year | 109% | −22.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 229% | −13.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 0.88 |
| Employees | 43K | 8,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.7× | 10.0× (better) |
| P/S | 1.2× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/B | 4.7× | 4.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3× (better) | 7.1× |
| P/FCF | 11.2× (better) | 11.7× |
| PEG | 0.03 | – |
| FCF yield | 9.0% (better) | 8.5% |
| Fair value | $136.25 | $43.43 |
| Margin of safety | −9.3% | −0.38% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.7% | 6.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.0% (better) | 7.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −0.93% | 9.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 10.5% (better) | 8.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 9.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 63.7% (better) | 49.0% |
| Operating margin | 13.7% | 20.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 10.0% | 16.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 10.6% | 14.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 40.5% | 45.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 74.8% | 117% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.41 | 2.08 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 5.55 (better) | 4.88 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 10.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 102% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 11.1% |
| Buyback yield | 7.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.7% | 10.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 113% | 61.1% |
| Held by insiders | 2.2% | 7.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$50.3M | −$7.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.4% | 7.5% |
Go deeper
- ANF stock overview
- ANF income statement
- ANF valuation and score
- BKE stock overview
- BKE income statement
- BKE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.