StockData

Andersons vs CHS

ANDE and CHSCL side by side, both in wholesale trade-non-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ANDE and CHSCL compare

CHS grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.6% versus −4.3% for Andersons).

CHS keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.8% compared with 1.8% at Andersons.

Both pay dividends: Andersons yields 1.4% and CHS 7.8%.

Andersons scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 13 for CHS), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricANDECHSCL
Size and price
Market cap$1.9B–
Share price$55.40$24.03
Change, 1 year11.2%−6.1%
Change, 5 years51.5%−16.2%
Beta (5Y)0.510.11
Employees2,13710K
StockData Score
Total score17 (better)13
Valuation score5 (better)0
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score4 (better)3
Health score34 (better)
Dividend score33
Valuation
P/E9.3×–
P/S0.2×–
P/B1.4×–
FCF yield−15.6%–
Fair value$107.78–
Margin of safety48.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−4.3%10.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average6.4% (better)0.40%
Net income growth (TTM)178% (better)83.3%
EPS growth (TTM)177%–
Profitability
Gross margin7.2% (better)4.6%
Operating margin–1.5%
Net margin1.8%2.8% (better)
FCF margin−2.6%2.9% (better)
Return on equity16.1% (better)9.6%
Return on invested capital–4.4%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.800.18 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA–1.41
Interest coverage–3.6×
Current ratio1.431.68 (better)
Altman Z-score4.05–
Piotroski F-score47 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield1.4%7.8% (better)
Payout ratio13.4%–
Years of dividend growth16–
Dividend growth, 5Y average2.3%–
Shareholder yield1.4%7.8% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions89.7%–
Held by insiders4.3%–
Insider net buying, 12 months−$9.8M–
Short interest, % of float4.3%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.