American Well vs Cass Information Systems
AMWL and CASS side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMWL and CASS compare
Cass Information Systems is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as American Well ($713M against $200M).
Cass Information Systems grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.1% versus −19.0% for American Well).
Cass Information Systems keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.9% compared with −35.7% at American Well.
Cass Information Systems pays a dividend yielding 2.3%; American Well does not pay one.
Cass Information Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 11 for American Well), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMWL | CASS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $200M | $713M |
| Share price | $11.74 | $55.71 |
| Change, 1 year | 186% | 33.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −92.0% | 23.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.98 | 0.59 |
| Employees | 562 | 156 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.1× |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 3.5× |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 3.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 21.4× |
| PEG | – | 18.35 |
| FCF yield | −13.2% | 4.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $18.20 | $53.55 |
| Margin of safety | 35.5% (better) | −4.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −19.0% | 8.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.33% | 5.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 21.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 24.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 8.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 51.9% | – |
| Operating margin | −37.3% | – |
| Net margin | −35.7% | 18.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −12.1% | 16.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −31.0% | 16.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −145% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 2.90 | – |
| Altman Z-score | −7.14 | 0.36 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 43.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 9 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 3.0% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 2.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 42.3% | 61.3% |
| Held by insiders | 15.8% | 4.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.0M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.7% | 3.2% |
Go deeper
- AMWL stock overview
- AMWL income statement
- AMWL valuation and score
- CASS stock overview
- CASS income statement
- CASS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.