Aemetis vs LanzaTech Global
AMTX and LNZA side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMTX and LNZA compare
Aemetis is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as LanzaTech Global ($86.6M against $50.4M).
LanzaTech Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (43.8% versus 23.6% for Aemetis).
LanzaTech Global keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 296% compared with −12.5% at Aemetis.
LanzaTech Global scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for Aemetis), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMTX | LNZA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $86.6M | $50.4M |
| Share price | $1.20 | $3.85 |
| Change, 1 year | −41.7% | −78.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −93.1% | −99.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.98 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 220 | 192 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 0.3× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 0.9× |
| P/B | – | 0.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 29.1× | – |
| FCF yield | −42.2% (better) | −67.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 23.6% | 43.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.5% | – |
| Operating margin | 7.2% (better) | −61.0% |
| Net margin | −12.5% | 296% (better) |
| FCF margin | −14.7% (better) | −58.0% |
| Return on equity | – | 146% |
| Return on invested capital | 17.5% (better) | −37.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 24.26 | – |
| Interest coverage | 0.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.07 | 2.48 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −3.50 | −3.22 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −20.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −20.8% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 24.5% | 25.4% |
| Held by insiders | 10.9% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$20.5K | $4.3M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.1% | – |
Go deeper
- AMTX stock overview
- AMTX income statement
- AMTX valuation and score
- LNZA stock overview
- LNZA income statement
- LNZA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.