Advanced Micro Devices vs Micron Technology
AMD and MU side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMD and MU compare
Advanced Micro Devices and Micron Technology are about the same size, with market caps of $903B and $918B.
On earnings, Micron Technology is cheaper: it trades at 10.9× trailing earnings, against 120× for Advanced Micro Devices.
Micron Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (256% versus 41.9% for Advanced Micro Devices).
Micron Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 63.8% compared with 16.8% at Advanced Micro Devices.
Micron Technology pays a dividend yielding 0.07%; Advanced Micro Devices does not pay one.
Micron Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (25 against 15 for Advanced Micro Devices), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMD | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $903B | $918B |
| Share price | $552.90 | $811.30 |
| Change, 1 year | 127% | 220% |
| Change, 5 years | 256% | 877% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.93 | 1.94 |
| Employees | 31K | 61K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 25 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Performance score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 120× | 10.9× (better) |
| P/S | 19.9× | 6.9× (better) |
| P/B | 13.2× | 6.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 111× | 8.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 128× | 15.6× (better) |
| PEG | 2.58 | – |
| FCF yield | 0.78% | 6.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $179.64 | $1877.77 |
| Margin of safety | −208% | 56.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 41.9% | 256% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 28.8% | 36.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 130% | 895% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 128% | 879% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 5.2% | 70.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.7% | 80.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 17.7% | 74.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 16.8% | 63.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 15.5% | 44.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.8% | 88.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.2% | 107% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.10 | 0.04 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.08 | −0.35 |
| Interest coverage | 46.8× | 937× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.72 | 3.31 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 21.67 (better) | 13.26 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.07% |
| Payout ratio | – | 0.72% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 39.6% |
| Buyback yield | 0.02% | 0.07% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.02% | 0.14% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.8% | 77.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.43% | 0.22% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$366M | −$331M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | 2.1% |
Go deeper
- AMD stock overview
- AMD income statement
- AMD valuation and score
- MU stock overview
- MU income statement
- MU valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.